I’m not a big fan of country music, but I have a huge crush on Carrie Underwood. She has an amazing voice, and she’s cute as a button (Cuter, even, as my mind strains to recall a moment in my life when I’ve seen a button and stopped to say, “Hey, that’s cute”). Sometimes, I think about what life would be like if we were together, and my mind wanders, asking questions about our compatibility. Questions, like, would she also be passionate about legislation to allow domestication of polar bears? Is she also banned from public libraries? Does she share my irrational fear of Maroon crayons? Perhaps I ask too much. In fact, I probably wouldn’t care about any of those things, so as long as she fell within two standard deviations of the (already rather high) mean value of crazy that most men have come to accept women are. Which, if she is anything like the characters she voices in her songs, she isn’t. I call into evidence her recent hit, “Before He Cheats”:
Chorus
And he don’t know…
That I dug my key into the side of his pretty little suped up 4 wheel drive,
carved my name into his leather seats…
I took a Louisville slugger to both head lights,
slashed a hole in all 4 tires…
Maybe next time he’ll think before he cheats.
I’ll admit, at the cost of my “indie street cred,” that I love this song (Can you imagine me singing this in the shower? Well, apparently neither can my neighbors, who ended up calling the police amidst beliefs that I was physically abusing a spouse). I can’t help but wonder, though, if anyone heard this song and made it their “girl power” anthem. You know, don’t let a man push you around; vandalize the frak out of their automobile instead of approaching problems in a civilized matter, like men do.
That’s when I realized feminism needs a public relations facelift. Yes, yes, I am quite aware that feminism is about gender equality and banishing prevalent beliefs about gender roles, but it, in fact, has come to be associated with unnaturally muscular women, asexuality and androgyny, “girl power” slogans, unshaven legs, and general disagreeability. The feminist movement needs changes, and it needs them soon:
1. Drop the use of the word “feminism” and push hard for neutral terms. “Womens’ rights” is probably the clear winner here, but a master marketeer can probably spin a better sound byte. Everything else about feminist philosophies should remain exactly the same, it’s just the name that really should change. Look to Henry VIII for guidance. Which leads me to my next point …
2. Axe the leadership, axe the current spokespeople. The womens’ rights movement needs better faces! Women are not attracted to the feminist movement because women are vain, and because women are constantly in competition with every other woman within three degrees of separation (don’t lie … men know, we just don’t care, no matter what we say to get around the bases). Women will not join an organization if there is any chance of their appearances being associated with the idea of being unattractive, because it puts them at a competitive advantage to all other women who are not associated with being unattractive. The new leadership needs to be women who are confident, successful and attractive, yet, are not overly aggressive, became successful without explicit use of their sexuality, and are well respected by men and women alike. In other words, the leadership and spokeswomen should be superhuman. Force Barbara Walters back into hiding in the attic, and bring Ivanka Trump into the foreground.
3. Begin recruiting them young. Women generally shy away from disciplines regarded as mens’ territories such as math and science due to their smaller brains, but the negative images of women in business have generally faded away, thanks to the emergence in America in the last thirty years of prominent women CEOs. Use business as the foot in the door. At a young age, create programs for budding businesswomen. The Girl Scouts kind of do this with their cookie racket, but they are thinking too small and not encouraging troupes to be creative with their product lines to grow revenue and grab market share. When these programs become fully accepted, even by the staunchest proponents of the school of My Daughter Will Be A Housewife Dammit, then it is time to sneak in the sciences into these programs.
4. Rewrite fairy tales. Monica Geller, one of the characters on Friends, quips at one point about how she has been thinking about her wedding since she was 4 years old. It was a scary moment in my life when I realized that this joke was based on much truth. Where do women get this idea of marriage and relationships being their end-all panacea? I’ll tell you where: Prince Charming, that rat bastard that ruined it for the rest of us that now have to work for womens’ affections and do things romantic things that violate our very genetic tendencies. I heard about some “feminist fairy tales” a while back. One of the stories has Rapunzel spending five hours a day doing pushups and pullups, saving herself from the tower, shaving her hair off, and joining a militant womens’ organization at the end of the story. Another story has Snow White filing date rape charges against Prince Charming, then, while in counseling, spending five hours a day doing pushups and pullups, shaving her hair off, and joining a militant womens’ organization at the end of the story (both stories, by the way, are exactly the type of press feminism does not need). These are bad examples, but they’re a start.
5. The last, and most important: don’t villanize men. This is important. Don’t villanize men. I’ve known enough feminist types in my heyday who are too quick to answer, “Well, women do that because MEN oppress women, yadda, yadda, MEN start wars”. Hey, it might be true, but get off your high horse and stop thinking that a matriarchal society would have been any different. I’m not suggesting this to win over the men, which it will help with; I’m suggesting this so it’ll win over the women, who still want the men, who are alienated by all this “you suck” rhetoric. Many men associate feminism with man hating, and man hating with the smashing of cars when angered. Women know feminism is associated with negative traits when men are looking for mates, and many womens’ organizations will shy away from teaching members feminist principles to avoid a negative reputation as membership equating to a red mark to the single men on the market.
Intelligent men and those like me who fake it rarely have any quarrel with womens’ rights. It doubles the potential employment pool. It doubles the number of buyers for goods. It doubles the number of inventors innovating. There’s a theory that division of labor along gender lines is why Cro-Magnon man outlived Neanderthal man, but we’re no longer a society of hunters and growers. Division of labor should be done by merit and ability. By supporting womens’ rights, we can advance our progress in maximizing the potential of our species. But until the womens’ rights movement corrects some very negative public perceptions, it will fail to gain effective traction and lose support. Already, several major changes in the worlds’ climate are moving against womens’ rights. The religious right, for instance, works to throw its political clout to keep women virginal and in the home. Globalization has the potential to help women advance, but if the womens’ rights movement never takes off, it also has the potential to turn the equality gap between men and women into a permanent impasse. Women need to wise up and take action to protect the world for their daughters, because the philosophies that would open up opportunities for them are stagnant in gaining support, and in several decades, may very well be in grave danger of extinction.
March 4, 2007 at 2:23 pm |
I don’t get the Carrie Underwoord reference. She’s a hot chic saying let’s screw assholey men over. Oh wait. You only said you wanted more hot chics in the feminist movement, but no more of this encouragement of violence against men.
Re: your 5 points:
1. A new term that’s emerged is “Womanism.” Alice Walker is one of the proponents of using the term womanism rather than feminism, though not for the reasons you listed; rather, the term “feminism” has come to be associated mainly with white women’s rights and “womanism,” some hope, will be more inclusive of colored women.
2. Naomi Wolf is attributed as one of the faces in third wave feminism. She’s a former model. Or what about Christina Aguilera? She’s an incredible womanist force in mainstream society today. A lot of these “points” you raise stem more from your personal stereotypes of the feminist movement rather than actual fact.
3. However, don’t be a crazy father and push your daughters into math and sciences too zealously either. That’s what my father did and we ended up loathing those subjects because even simple F=ma considerations throw me back to those traumatic days as a kid when my daunting 6 foot 1 father would stand behind me whacking a ruler stick into his palms warning us, “Don’t be careless. Focus! Hnh. You’re already 12. I was doing [insert some topic of advanced calculus here] when I was 4 years old! This should be cake!”
4. No comment.
5. Feminists generally don’t villainize men. Men are simply not used to women being politically active so when a woman passionately asserts an opinion on how the government, which is currently little more than an engine to propel male-dominance, needs to stop patronizing women, men flip their lids probably in the same way former slaveowners self-proclaimed masters express utter shock when those they’ve enslaved for centuries suddenly grow a backbone and say NO.
And you just totally punked out in the last paragraph there. “Ooh. Look at me. I’m not anti-feminist. I love women’s rights! It’s only ‘those OTHER’ men who would object to such a great, great movement.”
March 4, 2007 at 3:39 pm |
Number 6 on my list is, “Teach women how to read critically.”
Of course all of these things are based on my personal stereotypes, you crazy woman. The fact that I have stereotypes means that this “womanism” movement is doing a horrible job of defeating the associations in my mind between feminism and car-smashing-bitch (and I know who Naomi Wolf is, she graduated from the same high school as me … seeing her name does nothing for me). HENCE: Public relations makeover.
With that being said, the whole point of this post is, “nobody cares about feminism and feminists need to do something about it.” So if you are right and I am wrong, I guess that means feminism is going the right way, eh?
March 4, 2007 at 3:56 pm |
You’re saying you have these stereotypes of feminists because the feminists you know can’t seem to prove the contrary? That’s like me saying I hold this stereotype that Asian men are emasculated yet arrogant mamas’ boys with tiny wee-wees and this stereotype is perfectly legitimate because all the Asian men I know really are emasculated yet arrogant mamas’ boys with tiny wee-wees.
March 4, 2007 at 3:59 pm |
… and we need to DO something about it!!!
March 4, 2007 at 7:06 pm |
The problem with the public image of feminism is that it’s having problems defining itself.
What does it mean to be a good feminist? CEO of a fortune 500? Politically active? Unshaved legs?
What are the feminist virtues? Compassion? Individualism? Productivity? Unshaved legs?
These arent gender specific values. Individualism is a human virtue. Compansion is a human virtue. Being politically active is a democractic value. They are neutral values that have been assigned to different genders over many millenia of socialization. I maybe mistaken, but I don’t see a very clear distinction between being a good feminist (ethically) and being a good human being.
Feminism has been used mainly in two ways. 1) It’s been a social movement for improving rights for women and 2) a philosophy of living for women. The first one is defineable because it states a mission that the social movement seeks to accomplish (which is equal rights for women). The latter usage of feminism (as a philosophy of life) is a pointless endeavor because they are unable to effectively segregate what virtues it takes to be a good women and a good man. No gender owns the virtue of compassion or justice. These are gender neutral values.
What feminism needs to do, aside from forcing barbara walters into retirement is to define itself as a position for social advancement of women.
—————————————————————–
Another thing:
Christianity almost failed because they couldn’t agree upon a united front. Every part of the roman empire had their own version of it. Feminism is following a similar path.
Many young women are turned off from feminism because they think it’s a way of living. They see it as a membership to a style of living, like the way we attribute black framed glasses and converse sneakers to emo.
Feminism encompasses so many different sects that vary in opinions. Feminism ought to call in its own version of the council of nicaea and agree upon what ‘catholic’ feminism really is. Otherwise, you have women calling themselves feminists who are just a bunch of carrie underwoods who hate men.
March 4, 2007 at 7:49 pm |
I just watched this video again and re-read the lyrics. Carrie doesn’t even have evidence he’s cheating! She smashes his car up because she THINKS he’s cheating; it just so happens he is.
March 4, 2007 at 7:54 pm |
Yes. We’re looking for our very own Empress Feminine to serve the same role for us that Constantine served for the spread of modern Christianity.
The feminist movement always began as a response to inequality experienced by the sexes, with women bearing the heavier end of disadvantages and social handicaps. Feminism, thus, seeks to balance the power between the sexes, or find sex equality. However, this is where feminists diverge into different camps of thought: you’ve got dominance theorists (who pretty much say men are still the measure of all things), formal equity (treat similarly situated men and women equally, gender blindness); relational feminists (men and women are biologically hardwired differently and we need to recognize and respect those differences); socialist feminists, critical race feminists, lesbian feminists, I mean, the list goes on and on.
These days, there’s pretty much only two sects of feminists: Democrat feminists, who are the bleeding heart liberals that pine for some sort of revival of the Civil Rights movement; and Republican feminists, who are highly-educated female CEOs, Presidents, and other high ranking officials with lots of money and prestige. Thus, it’s not has scattered and haphazard as dionysian and posteriori would like the cyberworld to think.
March 4, 2007 at 7:56 pm |
Dionysian neglects the little but compelling fact that Carrie Underwood can do no wrong. Jesus told her that her boyfriend was cheatin’ on her. I’m debating, though, whether Jesus also told her to smash up the boyfriend’s car…
March 4, 2007 at 8:02 pm |
But I’m the only man in her life …
March 4, 2007 at 8:45 pm |
Why do I sense that Miss Underwood probably thinks Asian men are emasculated yet arrogant mamas’ boys with tiny wee-wees…who are good at math?
March 4, 2007 at 9:20 pm |
Maybe because she reads the comments section of your blog?
March 4, 2007 at 9:22 pm |
… and it’s official, there are 5 readers of Ink Du Jour. You, me, posteriori, buddhista, and that one guy that keeps performing searches on ‘Devon Aoki.”
March 4, 2007 at 9:36 pm |
I think it’s time that we take this blog public and see how much we can get with the IPO.
March 5, 2007 at 10:27 am |
Well it seems to me that the reason people have a hard time defining the terms of feminism is because whatever disadvantages women claimed to have faced have either been proven false or have long been remedied.
There simply isn’t anything for women to be feminist about.
Family Law – including divorce, child custody, alimony, child support laws almost exclusively benefit women.
Education – as a proffession and as a opportunity is dominated by women
Health spending – allocated almost entirely to researching womens illnesses
Law Enforcement – Protects women
Voting power – favours women who are majority, which means politicians are little more than LEGISLAVES to women.
Wealth – 60% percent of the worlds wealth is in the hands of women who are born it, into marry it and are beqeauthed it.
I contend that the term feminism is obsolete in light of the above, feminism has now been transformed into Gynocracy were men are the new oppressed sex.
March 5, 2007 at 12:51 pm |
Law enforcement protects women? What source is THIS cited from? Law enforcement doesn’t take calls about domestic violence seriously enough. That leads me to one issue still confronted by women today: violence, be it domestic violence, sexual harassment, or even rape.
Female sex workers are still being exploited all over the world. There are places right here in America that amount to little more than a prison where immigrant women are kept as sex slaves for paying men.
Employment discrimination. Try being a female engineer with a law degree trying to get a high-ranking job as a patent prosecution attorney. That field is still predominantly male. In the fields of math and sciences, women are still not taken seriously.
When I was in college (which wasn’t that long ago!), I knew a girl who literally looked like a barbie doll, with long think luscious blonde hair, big blue eyes, hourglass figure, yada yada, and she was ranked top 10% in the engineering school. She experienced tons of sex discrimination. Her male students constantly accused her of perhaps fucking the professors during office hours or what not to get high marks; otherwise, how could she “possibly” be ranked top 10%? She can’t be breathtaking and intelligent contemporaneously?!
Let’s not forget the ongoing debate over reproductive rights, which still hasn’t been settled in America. How is it even an issue, I wonder sometimes? For or against abortion, it’s still each individual woman’s right to choose. Only a male-dominated society would take that right away from all women and put it in the hands of a male-dominated patronizing government.
I counter the above contention that feminism is obsolete. As long as there is sex inequality in this world, the feminist movement cannot die. Any brief glimpse of the news these days, especially world news, will reveal that sex inequality, especially the oppression of women, is still pervasive in this society.
And one last thing– pornography still overwhelmingly shows the sexual dominance over women. Nothing turns a man on more than the professed servitude of a woman. That’s filthy disgusting and proof that feminists still have plenty to do.
March 5, 2007 at 4:17 pm |
I know women that totally whip me in math/sciences even though I’m just an nerdy little Asian boy who should be at the top of the math/science food chain by virtue of nerdiness. These women are not just the nerdy types. Some are the hot Taiwanese ones that try to run me over in their BMWs. I also know a motorcycle-riding ditsy, blonde girl whose math skills keep our nuclear submarines safe. Her sisters are hella smart too, but not as ditsy. When you’re wrong many times after judging a book by its cover, you’ll soon learn to stop or it’ll be your lost. On the flip side of that, every time a rich Taiwanese girl in a BMW runs you off the road, you begin to think that all Taiwanese girls hate you. You know they can drive too, because they drive a stick. *shakes fist*
I don’t think I know Akrypti, but you’re not the only “female engineer with a law degree trying to get a high-ranking job as a patent prosecution attorney”. The Executive Director of Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society is a woman. As well as the Associate Director.
Pornography is about fantasies and not about real life. If pornography mirrored real life, I would be working at a pizza delivery boy. I personally get turned on by powerful, outspoken women, but they go for white guys. What women want and what women say are two totally different things.
Remember, #5 Don’t villianize men.
March 5, 2007 at 4:31 pm |
Akrytpi is no engineer, “Warren” …
March 5, 2007 at 5:06 pm |
Yeah. I’m much more likely to be that Taiwanese chic driving stick running you over with her BMW…
March 5, 2007 at 5:18 pm |
[dionysian, via AIM]: so btw
[dionysian, via AIM]: your LAST post
[dionysian, via AIM]: now makes you sound like
[dionysian, via AIM]: you are calling yourself a hot, nerdy taiwanese girl with a BMW who can beat Warren at math and science
So let me clarify. I’m not hot. Nor am I nerdy. I don’t even own a BMW. I’m simply MORE LIKELY to BE a chic running over an Asian dude with a BMW than an engineer. And no. Without even knowing Warren, I can still safely bet that Warren far exceeds me in math and science proficiency. In fact my cat is intuitively more knowledgeable in physics than I am.
I didn’t villainize men. If anything, Warren villainized Asian women with his parched dry yet uber subtle use of irony and sarcasm.
March 5, 2007 at 5:55 pm |
Ha ha, funny how the internet is. It’s been a long time between moments like this. Maybe I’ll let you keep this between you guys and search “Devon Aoki” if I’m bored and want something to read.
March 6, 2007 at 11:34 am |
I do want to mention a personal story to Warren: Back in high school, I was friends with this guy who delivered pizzas. It’s hard to forget that morning when he came into school bright eyed and bushy tailed, sat down with us during homeroom and proclaimed, “Guess what. I lost my virginity. I went to deliver a pizza, made small talk with this college girl, and then we had sex. Sex is awesome!”
Fiction mirrors reality mirrors fiction…
May 31, 2008 at 2:16 pm |
since when do women have smaller brains…ABSURD!
November 2, 2008 at 3:23 am |
Thank you for your site
I made on photoshop backgrounds for myspace and youtube and ect..
my backgrounds:http://tinyurl.com/6r7cav
take care and thank you again!